Just say it

“I’m not sure about what happened in that meeting. I asked if they were OK with what we agreed to and they each said yes. But I’m not convinced.”

Does this ever happen to you? I have this conversation with a coaching once a week, on average.

My response never varies: “Say to them what you just said to me. Say, ‘I know you say you agree with this, but I’m not convinced.'”

Often, I hear this: “I wanted to tell them that this can’t work. I wanted to say that the what they asked me to do is not only impossible, it will get them a result exactly opposite the one they want.”

“What stopped you?”
“I could never say that.

And then, you do say that, but not to the person who needs to hear it and not at the time it could do some good.

A participant once came up with a ground rule I love:  This is the cab ride home.  This meeting, this conversation, this moment.

A Collaboration Treasure Map: Crankiness marks the spot

If you think you should be doing “it” better, you’re suffering needlessly.

A Director-level client told me about a recent conversation she’d had with a colleague, a department head. The department head was working herself into a fury, reiterating that my client should be doing a better job of “it.” Each time my client skillfully asked for more clarity, she got more cranky intensity. Running out of cleverly worded repartee, my client said:

“What is ‘it?’”
“I beg your pardon?” said the department head.
“This ‘it’ you keep referring to, the thing I should be doing. What exactly is ‘it?’”
“You should know what ‘it’ is.”
“I don’t.”
“But you are the Director – you should know.”
“I don’t know. Will you tell me?”

And she did. “It” was a simple list of 4 things the department head needed from the director. The director wrote them down, and made sure they got done.

What I love about this conversation is:

  • The director stayed grounded, calm and helpful.
  • She did not take the crankiness personally.
  • She did not get defensive and fire back her own “should.”
  • She did not shy away from the crankiness.
  • By interrogating the crankiness directly, she broke through a years-old stalemate between departments.

 

You can have similar, struggle-free results.  Most conversations are built on assumptions. The tricky thing about assumptions is they exist just out of our awareness, much like the foundation of a house. If, like a foundation, they were made of steel-reinforced concrete, there would be no problem. But our assumptions are made of the merest gossamer, wispy and hard to pin down. It’s easy to exceed their load-bearing limits. Basing your working agreements on assumptions leads to disappointment, which leads to unfortunate conclusions, which leads to judgments, which will get you horribly stuck, sometimes for years. Best to ferret out those assumptions as quick as you can.

There are three signs that assumptions are at work in the above conversation:

  • The level of intensity/crankiness escalates as the conversation goes on.
  • The use of the word “should” (Scratch crankiness hard enough and a “should” always leaps out).
  • The use of the word “it.”

Like the three horsemen of the apocalypse, these signal big conversational trouble. I hope you like horses, because you’ve got to move toward these to get back on track.

How to interrogate an assumption (and not the person making it)

  1. Calmly comment on the level of intensity/crankiness. “I’m getting a bit bowled over by your energy on this. Tell me what that’s about.” Or “You’ve raised your voice and leaned forward in your chair each time you talk about my campaign for bunnies in the workplace. Which makes me wonder: Do you think I’m crazy?”
  2. Comment on the word “should.” “I’m getting distracted by the word “should” which you’ve used 3 times in the last few seconds. What is it I should know or be doing?”
  3. Comment on the word “it. ”I’m sure I should know what “it” means, but I’m not at all clear. Could you give me the specifics again?”

In horror movies, there is always the terrifying knocking in the closet that no one wants to explore. It has to be investigated before the plot can continue, and we hang on the edge of our seats as the door swings open to reveal.. a truth we hadn’t imagined.  Assumptions are like that. You won’t know what the conversation is about until you look in the closet.

Why You Listen

The point of developing listening skills is not to show off  your virtuosity at paraphrasing, summarizing and asking a penetrating open-ended question.   It’s not so you can dazzle with your brilliance.  You don’t listen carefully so you can argue with someone about what they did or didn’t say, or what they did or didn’t mean.  (A client once told me how he’d used his smart pen to play back a conversation so he could prove that his colleague had used a particular phrase. Just thinking about this makes me cringe.)  Listening is not a weapon.  Listening is transformational, capable of turning the most mundane conversation into a rich exploration.  And what makes the difference is not perfect technique or perfect recall.  The difference is your intention.

If you aren’t interested in what someone has to say, all the listening skills in the world won’t help you.  But if you’re curious, even the most basic listening skills can make an encounter fascinating.  So if you’re not listening to prove yourself or to “win,” what are you listening for?

You listen so you can help your client have the best conversation they’ve had all week.  You listen to make them smarter.   We’ve all had moments when we aren’t even listening to ourselves, much less to anyone else.  Everyone does, no matter where they sit on the org chart.  Just this morning, in pilates class, my teacher said “put your heels on the bar” while reaching down and putting my toes on the bar.  When I said “Heels or toes?”  She flushed, laughed out loud and slowed down, being much more careful, thoughtful and specific for the rest of the class.  Isn’t that what we all want from our conversations?  Even if you are an administrative assistant, and your clients are high on you company’s org chart, you can use listening skills to help them slow down and listen to that crazy sentence that just came out of their mouth.  There’s another reason to listen, one that’s especially relevant for consultants.

You listen to prevent yourself from working harder than your client.  We’ve all done it: We find ourselves doing most of the talking, probably because we are anxious about our ability to help, or excited at the opportunity to make a difference or just plain loopy from exhaustion.  When you’re doing most of the talking, you’re going to end up with most of the responsibility.  If you were hoping to establish a partnership, you’ve just sent the wrong message.  Listening skills help you stop talking and listen.  This alone will make you appear more thoughtful, smarter, and more helpful.  It will make you act like a thought partner.

The choice is simple:  Show them how smart you are and stay a pair-of-hands in their eyes, or activate your curiosity and listen your way into thought partnership.  Here’s how to jumpstart your curiosity:

1. Stop talking.

2. Stop formulating your brilliant response.

3. You must interest yourself first.  Let the silence between you grow big enough to hold a brand new idea.    Let the silence inside you grow big enough for several ideas to collide and turn into wondering.   When the silence in you is big enough to hold your ignorance – the things you don’t know about the person you’re talking to, about their goals, their sensitivities, their strengths, or about the situation – then it’s time to ask a question.

4.  Ask from the wellspring of your interest.  Don’t worry about the right technique or the right phrasing.  If you are fascinated, the question will phrase itself and the conversation will come alive.

Curiosity and genuine interest are contagious.  Fascinate yourself first.

How to Confront Your Boss

If you think confronting your boss is a your ticket to the unemployment line, keep reading.

Mike dropped a blue folder on my desk and said:

“Building Effective Partnerships.  Base it on the Boston University model and teach it to physicians and programmers.  That’s your new assignment from Diane.” he said.

We were both staring at the blue folder.

I said: “I haven’t met Diane yet.  Is she…is this…”

“Does she usually make assignments through someone else?  Is she blind to the irony of assigning a training on ‘Building Effective Partnerships’ through a third party?”  Mike was grinning at me.

“Yes.   And, is our entire relationship going to be like this?  What if I have questions?”  We were both grinning now.

“Questions like, is this whole thing just an exercise, or does she mean it?’” Mike’s eyebrows bounced up and down, lending an air of intrigue to our conversation.

“Especially that one”

“She’s in her office right now.  Go ask her yourself,” said Mike as he limped out of my office.

Mike and I were both disabled, he from birth, and me from a recent injury.  The duration of my disability was unclear, but it had cost me my job as a technical writer and career as a bass player.   I was back at work after months away, sporting a cast on my arm and the hand-writing of a 5-year-old.  I’d been promoted 3 levels after completing a training and development internship in training and development and now reported to Diane.  Today was the forth day of the first job of my new career and it was off to a bad start

I was thinking about all that as I walked into Diane’s office and introduced myself. I sat in the proffered chair and thanked her for the Partnership Training assignment.  As we talked, I learned thinkgs that would come in handy later.  Assuming there would be a “later.”  As the conversation started to wind down, I took a deep breath.

“There’s no graceful way to ask this next question, Diane.  I hope you won’t find it offensive.  Is the training something you’re committed to, or is it more of an exercise?”

Diane was staring at me.  The light had gone out of her eyes.  I plunged ahead:  “It’s just that giving me the assignment through Mike didn’t seem like an act of partnership.  So I wondered if partnering was something we’d be doing ourselves as well as teaching to our clients.  Because if we aren’t practicing partnership with each other, I’ll still do my best work.  It just won’t do much good.

Diane looked thoughtful, then leaned forward and locked her eyes on mine.   I was certain I was about to be fired.

“This training has my full commitment.  The CIO is expecting it within 2 months, and he’s fully committed too.  We have to change this relationship, and you have the skills to help us.  Will you do that?”

“Yes.  It’s a wonderful assignment, and I’d love to help.”

“Good.  As for the way you got the assignment, I apologize.  I didn’t think it through.  I promise you it won’t happen again.”

In the 5 years I worked for her, it never did.

So, why didn’t I lose my job?  Here’s the anatomy of confrontation:

0. Connect first.  I’d just met the woman.  We needed to get acquainted.

1. Prepare them.  I used “I” statements that showed I was about to say something difficult, and that I regretted having to do s

2. Reveal more.  When she was looking daggers at me, I told her more of the story in my head, and more about what mattered to me instead of folding up like a broken lawn chair.

3. Honor their outcome.  What mattered to me was doing the best possible job in service of her desired outcome.  If the training was perfunctory, I was OK with that.  I was there to learn.

4. Delete the judgment.  Every statement was matter-of-fact, calm and judgment-free.

5. Be your intention.  My intention was to be helpful, period:  I exuded helpfulness.  I was helpfulness.

It’s steps 3, 4 and 5 that make you irresistible.  Steps 0-2 just make it a smoother ride.

If you’re thinking “You think that was hard?  Ha!  One time I had to…”  I hope you’ll tell me all about it in the comments below.

 

 

Telling the truth at Work

If you think you need it’s dangerous to speak the truth at work, let Bunster show you how simple it can be.

Word count: 655
Reading time: under 2 minutes

“You teach people how to treat you.”
– Oprah Winfrey

Bunster used to come to work with me, tearing up a cardboard box full of newspaper under the desk while I worked.  Most days we co-existed peacefully:  Bunster would nudge my ankle when I was in her way, I would move.  Except for when I was too absorbed to notice her first gentle nudge.  Too absorbed to notice the second double-nudge.  Too lost in my work to feel the head-butt that moved my ankles an inch or two.  But the sharp nip that followed?  That always got my attention.

I remember the day I felt her press her teeth on my ankle, just before the nip.  I froze.  I had to let her know biting wasn’t acceptable, but without frightening her, and I was a split second away from getting painfully nipped.  It was a conundrum:  My ankles were in her way, and biting me was not OK.  One did not cancel out the other.

I did the only thing I could think of, I yelled OUCH!  She released my ankle.  I moved it out of her way.  She hopped by.  I continued working.  And that was that:  She never laid her teeth on me again – even when my ankles were in her way.   I got much better at moving my feet out of her way at the first double-nudge. By saying what was so for me – that her nips hurt me – I taught her how to treat me.  We collaborated, which is a key consulting skill.

I think we forget it’s this simple or this mutual.  Instead, we complicate it with “But she’s my boss, ” or “The customer is always right,” or “I can’t say no – the work has to get done,” or “He’s a (programmer, exec, admin, marketing guy, etc.), and you know how they are.”

Instead, here are 5 ways to start speaking the simple truth:

  1. Admit you are affected. Admit it matters – both that you are treated well and that the relationship is important to you. This is the same as admitting you are human.  This is no more or less than the truth.   This is the most powerful way to level the playing field with anyone.
  2. Speak up immediately – before you have time to build a case about why you shouldn’t say anything and how powerless you are. It doesn’t even have to be well-phrased. “Ouch” works human-to-human, as well as human-to-bunny.
  3. Assume the other person cares about the information you are about to share. This is at least as true as thinking they aren’t interested, and it’s much more pleasant.
  4. Keep the blame and judgment out of it.  Just say what’s so.  This can be what’s so for you, what’s so about the situation or project, what’s so about your fears or your hopes, what’s so about your client’s or team member’s behavior the gut feeling you have.  Something that is obvious to you.
  5. Don’t make a case.  Just say it and move on.  You are offering more information about how you see things and inviting your business partner to join you in a more real conversation.  Keep the focus on creating more options rather than getting your way.  You’re creating the field the poet Rumi describes here:

“Out beyond ideas of right-doing and wrong-doing, there’s a field.

I’ll meet you there.”

How to say “no” at work

the word yes being projected from the word no; the word no being projected form the word yes

This morning’s doodle is about saying no at work and living to tell the tale.     Saying no can be scary or feel selfish.  Saying it too often can earn you a reputation as uncooperative or insubordinate.   Saying no can get you fired.

Saying yes has its pitfalls too:  If you say yes to everything, you’ll soon be saying no because time is finite. Something will fall off the list and it might be your health, your marriage, or your comics collection.  There are only so many hours in a day, and only so many of those are high quality.  You want to say no to the wrong things so you can say yes to the right ones.  And you’d like to keep your job, and enjoy it.   Take heart!  Saying no is easier – and safer – that you think.

Here’s how:

1.  Make a list with 2 parts:  What do you always want to say yes to?  What do you always want to say no to?  Here’s my list:

I am always saying yes to:

  • Doing my best work, the work that only I can do
  • Learning and growth
  • Work that meets my client’s cost-benefit test, ie.,  gives value beyond cost
  • Deeply understanding what my clients need and want
  • Keeping our relationship clean and vibrant

 

I am always saying no to:

  • Burnout – all varieties
  • Work that doesn’t bring me and my client alive
  • Work that harms my client or their group
  • Work that doesn’t make sense to me
  • Being treated badly, overlooked or undervalued

 

What’s on your list?  Take the time to write yours down now.   Keeping your list to no more than 10 will keep it lively and force you to eliminate repetition.  Please share it in the comments, if you’re willing.

After you get clear about your yes and your no, it’s time for the next step.

2. Give voice to the yes and the no, in the same sentence.  Yes and no are related, two sides of the same coin.  Here’s an example:  “I want to help you grow membership; I’m not yet seeing how what you propose will accomplish that.”  Too direct for you?  No problem.  Try this:  “I want to help you grow membership.  Help me understand how what you propose will do that.”  Still too direct?  Here’s my final offer:  “I want to help you grow membership.  So far, I’m not seeing how what you propose will get the gains you’re hoping for.  What am I missing?”

Here’s an extended example of using my “no” to bound or limit my yes.

You: “I love what you’re proposing and want to jump right in!  Thank you for the opportunity to do such exciting work.  At this moment, I’m unable to see how all this is possible in the time frame you’ve outlined.  What are your thoughts about that?”

Business partner/client/colleague: “You’re the expert.  You’ll figure it out.”

You: “Thanks for that.  In my experience, jumping into a project of this complexity without determining realistic time-frames leads to last minute decisions that aren’t in the best interested of the business. (pause)  I recommend we prioritize your list so we can hold on to what’s most important.”

3.  Let your intention shout yes, even as your words say no.  You are always saying yes to the relationship with your client, customer, boss or colleague.  If you don’t mean “I want to help you,” then you need to go back to your list and figure out what you aren’t giving voice to.

Fail at Organizational Change in 3 Easy Steps!

80% of all organizational change initiatives fail. Either they fail to get off the ground, or they work only superficially and then fade away.

I think we can do much, much better better than 80%.   Why not shoot for a 100% failure rate?  We’re so close.  Here is my top 3 list for failing at organizational change:

 

#3. Underfund the change, either in terms of time or money. The more severely you underfund, the more quickly the change will tank. Unfortunately, if you overfund it, you can also sink your change initiative.  Luckily, there’s a key to getting it wrong 100% of the time:  Don’t review your original assumptions.  Yes, it really is that simple!  Just stick unwaveringly to your original plans, ignoring new information.  Extra credit:  call people names when they disagree.

Overfunding and underfunding are two sides of the same coin. We underfund, because we are in denial about what it will take to get what we want. We overfund because the change feels big to us, so it must be big.  And, we do one of these because we’re keeping the change at arms distance. It’s not close enough to us to know it well. No need to fuss about which it is. If your project is sputtering from neglect or drowning in personnel without achieving commensurate results, take another look. It’s probably this second key to failing at Organizational Change:

 

#2. Fail to define goals for the change that are clear, specific and measurable.Instead, use words like “better,” more,” and “less.” Or, say “we’re going to implement this model and leave it up to each person to operationalize.”

This is a fine place to start exploration and change, not the place to leave it. It’s a cop-out not to push through to clarity, to the place where your simple, single-pointed message vibrates, it’s so alive. You’ll know you’ve got it when you can easily see how to measure it – both that it is happening (the behavior changes) and that it makes a difference (your business goals).

Pushing for clarity of what to measure is the number one way to find out what you really want out of this. Do it early. It will improve everything and chew your project down to size. If you don’t know how to measure it, or can’t find the time, what does that tell you about your commitment level? Exactly. Which leads us to the number 1 way to guarantee an organizational change initiative fails:

#1. Fail to change yourself. It’s the you-change-I-don’t-have-to model. Works like a hot knife through butter. If leadership isn’t changing, it telegraphs to the entire organization that it’s business as usual. No matter what else you do, people will follow your lead. Your behavioral lead. They’ll watch what you do, rather than listen to what you say. After all, you aren’t listening to you. Why should they?

I hear people bemoan the terrible communication in their organization. To which I say HA! Gossip is a fabulous communication system, always working, always free. Imitation is the same: always working, always free. It’s built in to the human organism through something called mirror neurons, and popularized in the phrase “monkey see, monkey do.” Employee see, employee do. It’s simple: If you ask them to make uncomfortable changes and you yourself stay in the comfortable tracks of habit and certainty, monkey see, monkey do. If the change isn’t taking hold, look at the face in the mirror and start there.

That’s why you go through the agony of #3 and #2. Because it changes you.

Er, I mean, that’s why you refuse to go through 2 and 3. So you can refuse to change. At all. So you can get to 100% failure.

Follow your ignorance

Lately, I’ve been watching people in their lives, noticing the difference between those who are successful and happy, and those who are less so. It looks to me like the more successful ones have learned to surf their anxiety better. Not that they are more talented, or smarter – they are simply more able to show up every day and learn from their mistakes, which they court rather than try to avoid. They manage to keep inching forward, a little more each day. Perhaps this is what Woody Allen meant when he said “90% of success is just showing up.” Or Edison when he said “Genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration.”

Just yesterday, I was talking to local luthier, Kenny Hill. We were in his shop where he was working on a copy of a 1856 Torres classical guitar. He was telling me about his process, and how the historical copies he made taught him the principles he used in his modern, experimental line of guitars. To make a long story short, he viewed the whole thing as one continuous mistake: he tried things and then, if he liked them, he tried to sell them. If they sold, he turned the design over the his assistants and they made them in bigger quantities. Sometimes he’d put a guitar away for months or years, thinking it was a lost cause only to take it off the shelf and be surprised by what was there. The whole process seemed to bemuse him, which fascinated me, because his guitars are highly prized by classical guitarists all over the world.

It got me to thinking about the things we show up for at work everyday: The tasks, the mission, the people. And about how all of them can lose their luster over time due to boredom or frustration. It’s painful to invest ourselves in something or someone and not get what we worked so hard for. So, like Kenny with a guitar that isn’t working, we put it away for awhile and focus our attention elsewhere. Kenny comes back to his “failed” guitars with curiosity and the soul of an inventor: what can I learn? Edgar Schein calls this “accessing your ignorance” and considers it a cornerstone of effective consulting.

That got me thinking about how we stop showing up. How we decide the guitar, the person, the situation is a failure, and not worth further attention, and leave it on the shelf. The key seems to being willing to change our preconceptions and learn to approach our guitars – the situation or the people in our lives – differently.  To approach from the perspective of what I don’t know, rather than all I’m certain of through previous painful experience.  To let go of my wounded – and wounding – certainty.

I used to joke about combining these two quotes, “Follow your bliss” and “Ignorance is bliss,” saying if both are true, then following your ignorance must be surest path to bliss.

Well, yeah.

________________________

Add your voice to the conversation.

Either/Or vs. Both/And

Bowen family systems theory has colonized my thoughts for the last couple of months. Psychiatrist Murray Bowen spent his career creating a more scientific framework for psychology. His framework is radically different from what I’ve been used to, and is causing a fair amount of soul-searching on my part. I’m finding this journey riveting.

Bowen theory (the short version)

In a nutshell, Bowen believes that all groups – families, teams, organizations – form systems based on the anxiety that arises when choosing between our ‘self’ and belonging to the group. We pass this anxiety around like a cold: Someone is always infected. In Bowen’s view, our role in this system determines our behavior more than our personal characteristics. Unless and until I’m willing to stop reacting to that underlying anxiety and choose a response that takes everybody’s needs into account – mine included. In this view, autocratic behavior is just another word for anxiety. Always being the one to stay late and do something for a client or the team is too.

What to do about it (in general)

In his approach, you stay connected with everyone in the system and maintain your own integrity. It’s not either-or, it’s both-and. You don’t join others at your expense and you don’t take your marbles and go home. This is not the comfortable choice. It’s more like a crucible out of which comes maturity and growth, not just for you, but for the whole system. But it’s not you righteously modeling a behavior you want others to adopt – it’s you choosing your path and sticking with it while staying connected and available to others, despite the flack they are giving you. You listen, and you connect, and you decide what to do about what others are telling you. This requires thoughtfulness and commitment without shutting others out. Bowen calls this differentiation.

An Example

The best example I can think of is having someone edit your writing. It’s your writing – you are the author. It’s your voice, your point of view, your self-expression. You are the final decision-maker. The editor gives you her opinion, often quite forcefully. As you take it in, you are beset with many thoughts: This editor is an idiot, she doesn’t get me at all. Or: This editor is an expert, I’d better do exactly what she says or my piece won’t be any good. With experience, you know that a good night’s sleep will allow a third voice to enter the conversation in your head: Some of these suggestions are great, even though they’ll require re-working entire sections. Some of them seem picayune, so I’ll ignore them, and other seem over-zealous, and appear to miss my point. I’ve got to talk those over with her.

Bowen’s theory explains so much of what I see in myself and in my clients. And it explains it in a way that doesn’t fence anyone in, which is why I love it. Trouble is, I don’t yet know how to apply it. That’s the tricky thing about theory: No user manual. So, into the lab we go. Let the experiments begin.

What to do about it (the specifics)

Decisions are anxiety-laden. Even simple decisions get complicated by the underlying emotional process that glues us together. It goes like this: I think the decision is mine alone to make and you think I should have consulted you. The leaders I coach often find themselves in this dilemma. They want to build a team, and they want to control the decisions for which they are held responsible. It looks unsolvable, and to some extent it is. By that I mean it’s a dilemma that never goes away. There is no one-size-fits-all approach which means you have to think your way through each decision. Analyze it to see which parts involve others and which are your alone. When we are reactive and wanting primarily to reduce our anxiety, we get this wrong.

Each decision has two aspects: What’s mine alone to decide, and what involves someone else. If I slow my automatic reaction down and go step-by-step, this distinction pops out. When I react automatically, I miss it. They key is to refuse to choose between them and me.

I’ll give you a universal example: A client wants the impossible, and right now. I want to go home on time and have dinner with my friends and play music. On the surface my evening looks doomed. I seem to have been presented with an either or decision: either I do what the client wants, or I have my evening. It’s that self vs. other dilemma. If the client is senior to me, I know what I have to do, at least that’s what our anxious mind says. Or, I may be so angry at these requests and the sacrifices I’ve made to honor them, that I simply say no.

The third way

Virginia Satir, another pioneer in the systems approach to groups, advised her students to never leave their clients with only two choices. She advocated te power of the third way, believing the third option is what took a client out of reactivity and into authentic choice.

The third option in the above situation stands a much better chance of satisfying each of you. Here’s one way it might sound: “I’ve got a dilemma: You want me to stay late tonight to work on this and I have plans I cherish and want to keep. How can we both get what we want?” Your job in the ensuing conversation is to refuse to choose between your needs and their needs. Do not settle for less than meeting both of your needs. This requires you to immunize yourself against their anxiety and increase your tolerance for discomfort – theirs and yours. The pay-off is a stronger relationship with your client, a better solution to the current dilemma, and the delicious surge of energy that comes from standing up to anxiety.

I’m very curious to know what you think about this. What’s your experience with the third way? And, because I’m writing on a topic I’m still digesting, I wonder if I’m making sense. I welcome your feedback.

For those of you who receive this by email, here’s a link to the blog post so you can leave a comment. Scroll down a little to the comment box.

When your clients ask the impossible

One of my coaching clients told me about a moment of such consulting brilliance that I had to share. She manages the workflow of an internal advertising agency. Her daily bread is the impossible deadline: A brochure takes 3 weeks, the account manager wants it in 3 days, because the client needs it. I’ve been infiltrating her organization with The Anxious Organization, by Jeffrey Miller, and reinforcing his basic message: Responding to another’s anxiety with your own anxiety makes everyone more crazy. Better to calmly stand for what’s correct, proper and factual. That way everyone calms down and can think more clearly.

So, she gets one of these crazy requests, with an added detail: the event the brochure is meant to support is in 3 days. So, she calmly says: “A brochure like that takes 3 weeks. Tell your client that and ask if they still want the brochure. If they do, we’ll be happy to produce it.”

Pure genius.

The message behind the words is this: “We want to help, we say yes to the brochure and yes to you and your client, and we say no to the deadline.” The effect of calmly pointing out the obvious is that everyone relaxes and is able to focus on the real issue: The client needs something in 3 days and it can’t be a brochure. Problem-solving ensues. If I’m the client, I might say “What can you get me in 3 days?” And, if I were my client, I might say “What are you hoping to accomplish?” Horse-trading ensues, this time about real needs rather than imaginary solutions.

She could have said: “3 days? Are you crazy? We can’t do a brochure in 3 days! We can’t do it.” And waited for the call from her boss’s boss’s boss, telling her to do it anyway. That’s the usual response to saying no the work, the account manager and the client.

She could have said “That’s an impossible deadline. We’ll do what we can,” and delivered the brochure in 3 weeks, while being hounded by the account manager and the client, and damaging her organization’s credibility. We’ve all heard the lie meant to soothe: The check is in the mail. Your new kitchen will be ready in 2 weeks. I’m from HR, I’m here to help.

The key is this: Say no to the crazy deadline, the idea that will make things worse, the plan that is doomed. But say yes the to person, the relationship, the goal, the inspiration, the aspiration, the ideal, the desire, the yearning that led them to make such a hair-brained request in the first place. That’s where the home run is, lurking just under the request that makes you want to scream.

Think of the client or the request you most want to say no to. Separate out the part you will say no to from the part you can authentically support. Treat them separately, and speak the unanxious truth to both. In the midst of all the noes you must say, what can you say yes to?